Apache Beam Performance Between Python Vs Java Running on GCP Dataflow

By -

We have Beam data pipeline running on GCP dataflow written using both Python and Java. In the beginning, we had some simple and straightforward python beam jobs that works very well. So most recently we decided to transform more java beam to python beam job. When we having more complicated job, especially the job requiring windowing in the beam, we noticed that there is a significant slowness in python job than java job which end up using more cpu and memory and cost much more.

some sample python code looks like:

        step1 = (
        read_from_pub_sub
        | "MapKey" >> beam.Map(lambda elem: (elem.data[key], elem))
        | "WindowResults"
        >> beam.WindowInto(
            beam.window.SlidingWindows(360,90),
            allowed_lateness=args.allowed_lateness,
        )
        | "GroupById" >> beam.GroupByKey()

And Java code is like:

 PCollection<DataStructure> step1 =
      message
          .apply(
              "MapKey",
              MapElements.into(
                      TypeDescriptors.kvs(
                          TypeDescriptors.strings(), TypeDescriptor.of(DataStructure.class)))
                  .via(event -> KV.of(event.key, event)))
          .apply(
              "WindowResults",
              Window.<KV<String, CustomInterval>>into(
                      SlidingWindows.of(Duration.standardSeconds(360))
                          .every(Duration.standardSeconds(90)))
                  .withAllowedLateness(Duration.standardSeconds(this.allowedLateness))
                  .discardingFiredPanes())
          .apply("GroupById", GroupByKey.<String, DataStructure>create())

We noticed Python is always using like 3 more times CPU and memory than Java needed. We did some experimental tests that just ran JSON input and JSON output, same results. We are not sure that is just because Python, in general, is slower than java or the way the GCP Dataflow execute Beam Python and Java is different. Any similar experience, tests and reasons why this is are appreciated.



from Recent Questions - Stack Overflow https://ift.tt/33RkTrP
https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Today Walkin 14th-Sept

By -
Image
14th Sept 2017 ( GO Through all List) Read Walkin details properly , Try to call company before attending if possible !!! ==================================== 1. Myntra through fresherworld (Call Based , Venue shared to shortlisted candidates) _____________________________ 2. Magna : Hiring for Client Harman : C++
Read more

Spring Elasticsearch Operations

By -
Elasticsearch Operations Spring Data Elasticsearch uses two interfaces to define the operations that can be called against an Elasticsearch index. These are ElasticsearchOperations and ReactiveElasticsearchOperations. Whereas the first is used with the classic synchronous implementations, the second one uses reactive infrastructure. The default implementations of the interfaces offer: Read/Write mapping support for domain types. A rich query and criteria api. Resource management and Exception translation. ElasticsearchTemplate The ElasticsearchTemplate is an implementation of the ElasticsearchOperations interface using the Transport Client. @Configuration public class TransportClientConfig extends ElasticsearchConfigurationSupport {   @Bean   public Client elasticsearchClient() throws UnknownHostException {                      Settings settings = Settings.builder().put("cluster.name", "elasticsearch")....
Read more

Hibernate Search - Elasticsearch with JSON manipulation

By -
Elasticsearch with JSON manipulation Elasticsearch ships with many features. It is possible that at some point, one feature you need will not be exposed by the Search DSL. To work around such limitations, Hibernate Search provides ways to: Transform the HTTP request sent to Elasticsearch for search queries. Read the raw JSON of the HTTP response received from Elasticsearch for search queries. Direct changes to the HTTP request may conflict with Hibernate Search features and be supported differently by different versions of Elasticsearch. Similarly, the content of the HTTP response may change depending on the version of Elasticsearch, depending on which Hibernate Search features are used, and even depending on how Hibernate Search features are implemented. Thus, features relying on direct access to HTTP requests or responses cannot be guaranteed to continue to work when upgrading Hibernate Search, even for micro upgrades (x.y.z to x.y.(z+1)). Use this at your own risk....
Read more