Why would LIMIT 2 queries work but LIMIT 1 always times out?
I'm using this public Postgres DB of NEAR protocol: https://github.com/near/near-indexer-for-explorer#shared-public-access
postgres://public_readonly:nearprotocol@mainnet.db.explorer.indexer.near.dev/mainnet_explorer
SELECT "public"."receipts"."receipt_id",
"public"."receipts"."included_in_block_hash",
"public"."receipts"."included_in_chunk_hash",
"public"."receipts"."index_in_chunk",
"public"."receipts"."included_in_block_timestamp",
"public"."receipts"."predecessor_account_id",
"public"."receipts"."receiver_account_id",
"public"."receipts"."receipt_kind",
"public"."receipts"."originated_from_transaction_hash"
FROM "public"."receipts"
WHERE ("public"."receipts"."receipt_id") IN
(SELECT "t0"."receipt_id"
FROM "public"."receipts" AS "t0"
INNER JOIN "public"."action_receipts" AS "j0" ON ("j0"."receipt_id") = ("t0"."receipt_id")
WHERE ("j0"."signer_account_id" = 'ryancwalsh.near'
AND "t0"."receipt_id" IS NOT NULL))
ORDER BY "public"."receipts"."included_in_block_timestamp" DESC
LIMIT 1
OFFSET 0
always results in:
ERROR: canceling statement due to statement timeout
SQL state: 57014
But if I change it to LIMIT 2, the query runs in less than 1 second.
How would that ever be the case? Does that mean the database isn't set up well? Or am I doing something wrong?
P.S. The query here was generated via Prisma. findFirst always times out, so I think I might need to change it to findMany as a workaround.
from Recent Questions - Stack Overflow https://ift.tt/TgFkx2f
https://ift.tt/HVwpivm
Comments
Post a Comment